A 3 YEAR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION, USING CRYOPRESERVED DONOR SPERMATOZOA AND CYCLE MONITORING BY URINARY OR SERUM LUTEINIZING-HORMONE MEASUREMENTS
G. Horne et al., A 3 YEAR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION, USING CRYOPRESERVED DONOR SPERMATOZOA AND CYCLE MONITORING BY URINARY OR SERUM LUTEINIZING-HORMONE MEASUREMENTS, Human reproduction (Oxford. Print), 13(11), 1998, pp. 3045-3048
Insemination with donor spermatozoa is an integral part of infertility
treatment. For the last 3 years in our unit, intrauterine inseminatio
n with donor spermatozoa (IUID) has been used in preference to vaginal
insemination, In this retrospective study, patients were offered an i
nitial course of five single intrauterine inseminations with cryoprese
rved donor spermatozoa and treatment was then reviewed. A total of 389
patients received 1465 inseminations, In all, 1119 cycles were monito
red using luteinizing hormone serum analyses and 346 cycles using the
urine home test kits. The clinical pregnancy rate per insemination for
the cycles monitored by the serum assay was 18.0% (202/1119) compared
with the urine cycles (13.7%, 46/346) (P <05), The pregnancy loss rat
e was not significantly different (14.4%, 29/202 and 21.7%, 10/46) (se
rum and urine cycles respectively). The viable clinical pregnancy rate
was significantly higher (P <03) for the serum cycles than for the cy
cles using the urinary monitoring (15.5%, 173/1119 and 10.4%, 36/346 r
espectively). The cycles monitored by serum assay had a significantly
higher cumulative viable clinical pregnancy rate (P <0001) of 70.2% af
ter nine inseminations compared with the urine monitored cycles of 54.
8%. The majority of patients opted for the serum cycles,,vith a minori
ty self-selecting the urine cycles mainly for travelling convenience.
The explanation for the significant differences between the viable cli
nical pregnancy rates per insemination and the cumulative viable clini
cal pregnancy rates may be due to the sensitivity of the urine home te
st kit or the patients' interpretation of the result.