AN ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOM STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF MIDVERTEBRAL SLICE PLACEMENT AND REGION-OF-INTEREST POSITIONING ON THE REPRODUCIBILITY OFSINGLE-ENERGY QUANTITATIVE CT (QCT) OF THE SPINE
Sa. Schmitz et al., AN ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOM STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF MIDVERTEBRAL SLICE PLACEMENT AND REGION-OF-INTEREST POSITIONING ON THE REPRODUCIBILITY OFSINGLE-ENERGY QUANTITATIVE CT (QCT) OF THE SPINE, Journal of computer assisted tomography, 22(6), 1998, pp. 932-937
Purpose: The purpose of our study was to develop an anthropomorphic ph
antom with a 3D external reference system capable of geometrically des
cribing the region of interest (ROI) of single-energy quantitative CT
(QCT) scans and to study the reproducibility of ROI placement (volume)
and bone mineral density (BMD) after operator-defined and algorithm-s
upported midvertebral slice (MVS) placement. Method: In three vertebra
e (L1-3) of 10 human cadaveric spines placed in a water phantom, MVSs
were defined by an operator and an algorithm-supported technique on la
teral digital CT radiographs, and QCT scans were performed accordingly
. The measurements were repeated once after repositioning the phantom
on the CT table. ROIs of the trabecular bone were determined with a st
andard technique. The percentage of bone volume was calculated for one
ROI not covered by the repetition (volume mismatch percent). Results:
Reproducibility with algorithm-supported MVS placement was superior t
o that of operator-defined positioning with regard to volume mismatch
(mean +/- SD): 10.6 +/- 8.4 vs. 7.9 +/- 5.3%; and mean of paired BMDs
(mean of three vertebral bodies): 2.7 vs. 1.5% (p < 0.05). Conclusion:
The ROI volume mismatch of repeated QCT scans, which is similar to 10
% of ROI volume, can be quantified with an external reference system.
Automated placement is superior to the manual technique and should be
used in clinical practice.