Topex, an index of topographic exposure, has been an important compone
nt of regression models that predict site windiness. However, field-ba
sed topex can overestimate the shelter of distant hills and does not d
iscriminate between hilltop and plateau sites. By using digital terrai
n models, it has become possible to calculate alternative formulations
of topex with limits to the distance within which the skyline is soug
ht, and with declinations (negative values) permitted. These alternati
ves have been tested using a dataset of tatter flags in upland Britain
. A series of multiple regressions was performed with explanatory vari
ables grid, elevation and modified topex, expressed as total topex and
as sinusoidal terms to represent aspect and valley shape and directio
n. A distance limit of 0.5 km proved superior to thresholds of 0.25, 0
.75, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 10.0 km, and to field topex. Each term except a
spect showed a peak in variance ratio at the 0.5 km distance. Although
the coefficients varied little between regressions, the topex compone
nt of estimated exposure for hilltop sites can vary substantially with
the choice of threshold. The use of a distance threshold can lead to
improved estimates for these sites. There was no overall improvement i
n prediction of site windiness when compared with a previous regressio
n and recalculation of the windiness index of upland Britain currently
used in prediction of windthrow and in ecological site classification
is not obviously required. However, the use of a distance limit would
be worth while in future studies using topographic indices because of
the apparent improvement in site discrimination and because distance-
limited topex may be more easily calculated.