Background: Volume controlled intermittent ventilation (IPPV) via face
mask is a treatment of proven efficacy for chronic respiratory failur
e (CRF). Pressure support ventilation has recently been introduced in
the treatment of CRF. In this study we investigated whether pressure c
onstant ventilation (PCV) via face mask could be an adequate long term
alternative to IPPV. Patients and Methods: We studied 30 (24 male, ag
e: 52.2+/-15.9 years) patients with CRF. We measured the following par
ameters at baseline, after 1, 2 and 6 months, respectively: blood gas
analysis, oxygen saturation, vital capacity, forced exspiratory volume
, breathing frequency, tidal volume, inspiratory mouth occlusion press
ure, maximal inspiratory pressure. subjective symptom scores and venti
lator acceptance scores. In all patients, we attempted to treat with I
PPV over 1 month, followed by 1 month's trial of PCV. If PCV, compared
to IPPV, was adequate, PCV was continued for a follow-up period of 4
months' duration. If patients deteriorated after PCV they were treated
the following 4 months with IPPV. Results: In 28 out of 30 patients C
RF improved concerning subjective and objective parameters. After IPPV
18 our of 28 patients changed to PCV, with an equal quality of treatm
ent (PCV-responder). Ten patients were PCV-nonresponders since compare
d to IPPV the subjective scores deteriorated and the PaCO2 increased a
gain, In all patients of either therapy group, subjective and objectiv
e parameters remained constant for another 4 months period. Ar baselin
e the PCV-nonresponders had significantly higher degree of hypercapnia
and oxygen desaturation; no other parameters were found to be of pred
ictive value concerning the efficacy of PCV. Conclusions: PCV proved t
o be an alternative to IPPV in the treatment of chronic respiratory in
sufficiency in approximately 60% of the patients with CRF. However the
re is a subgroup with more severe CRF at baseline in whom PCV is inade
quate.