Mr. Gilbert, RACE, SPACE, AND POWER - THE SURVIVAL STRATEGIES OF WORKING POOR WOMEN, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(4), 1998, pp. 595-621
Feminist geographers have documented that the spatial entrapment of ma
ny women negatively affects their economic opportunities. The experien
ces of many African-American women, however, suggest that the spatial-
entrapment thesis requires refinement. I argue that the spatial-entrap
ment thesis is based on a problematic conceptualization of the links b
etween space and power in people's daily lives, one that equates immob
ility with powerlessness and mobility with power. The thesis not only
theorizes power as unidirectional (i.e., more power, more mobility), i
t also masks important differences among women by undertheorizing mobi
lity and immobility relative to social relations other than gender, su
ch as ''race.'' I argue that, depending on the constellation of power
relations, the spatial boundedness of women's lives is a potential res
ource for, as well as a constraint on, their economic security. The ut
ility of this reconceptualization of the links between space and power
for examining the opportunities for and barriers to women's economic
security is demonstrated through an analysis of the role of place-base
d personal networks in the survival strategies of working poor African
-American and white women with children in Worcester, Massachusetts. I
first evaluate these women's experiences in terms of the spatial-entr
apment thesis. Then I examine whether women's use of spatial rootednes
s in the construction of their survival strategies can be enabling as
well as constraining. The results confirm that the spatial boundedness
of women's daily lives and their survival strategies are mutually con
stituted; that is, place-based personal networks are an important comp
onent of survival strategies, and can be both enabling and constrainin
g, depending on how racism structures women's experiences.