Z. Olumee et al., DROPLET DYNAMICS CHANGES IN ELECTROSTATIC SPRAYS OF METHANOL-WATER MIXTURES, The journal of physical chemistry. A, Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory, 102(46), 1998, pp. 9154-9160
Two-dimensional phase Doppler anemometry measurements have been carrie
d out to determine the size and velocity distributions of electrospray
ed droplets generated from methanol-water mixtures. We investigated sp
raying conditions close to those of electrospray ionization sources. T
he droplet size and the axial and radial velocity distributions were m
easured as a function of liquid flow rate, needle-to-counter electrode
distance, bias voltage, position of the probe volume, and electrical
conductivity of the liquid. In 90:10 (v/v) methanol-water mixtures the
droplet size decreased from similar to 7 to similar to 1.6 mu m as th
e conductivity increased as a consequence of a 3 orders of magnitude i
ncrease in ionic strength. As the position of the probe volume was mov
ed along the spray axis, two different spray dynamics were observed. S
olutions of low conductivity (c < 10(-5) M) on the average produced 5.
5 mu m droplets at the capillary that gradually decreased to 4.0 mu m
as the drops moved away from the tip. Solutions of higher conductivity
(c > 10(-3) M), however, resulted in smaller droplets at the needle (
1.6 mu m) that increased in size to 4.2 mu m as the particles traveled
toward the counter electrode. The droplet size reduction can be expla
ined by evaporation and/or Coulomb explosion, whereas the increase in
droplet size may be the consequence of droplet segregation or coalesce
nce. Axial velocity distributions show compression along the spray axi
s (e.g., observed at 10 mm similar to 50% reduction of the width at 4
mm is seen). Moving downstream, the average velocity of droplets from
water-methanol mixtures decreases monotonically. Solutions containing
KCl exhibit a maximum in axial droplet velocity as the probe volume mo
ves away from the capillary. These profile changes can be explained by
differences in the electric field distribution along the spray center
line.