The efficiency of surgical research has again become the subject of de
bate. Clinical research is required to improve our understanding of su
rgical disorders and our ability to treat patients. This involves both
experimental research (research in the test tube) and clinical resear
ch in actual patients. The surgeon must remain the expert because it i
s he who deals with the patient and is confronted with his problems. O
n the other hand, care for the patient, must always be the central iss
ue. Here a new orientation is needed, evaluating the effectiveness of
surgical research from the patient's point of view. Surgical treatment
, particularly surgical research, must be adapted first to the individ
ual patient and only secondly to the surgical disease - the problem mu
st determine the method, not vice versa. While it is clear that a crea
tive atmosphere, supportive structure and efficient organisation are e
normously helpful, today's exaggerated attention to matters of structu
re and organisation are often poor substitutes for creativity and intu
ition. Surgical research does not refer solely to therapy research but
includes methods for carrying out controlled clinical trials, establi
shing guidelines and scores and designing instruments for measuring ou
tcome. Socioeconomic and analyses and ethical considerations are cruci
al for facing such conflicts as ''quality versus quantity'', ''profess
ion versus business'', ''patient care versus economics costs''. Propos
als for designing more effective concepts, structure and organisation
for clinical research are presented here, and three models are introdu
ced: the cooperation model, the integration model and a mixture of the
two.