Models of the effects of disturbance on ecological communities have la
rgely considered communities of competing species at a single trophic
level. In contrast, most real communities have multiple interacting tr
ophic levels. I explored several versions of simple single- and multit
rophic models to determine whether predictions of the intermediate dis
turbance hypothesis (IDH), derived from considering only a single trop
hic level, apply to multitrophic situations. The IDH was predicted by
models of competing species at a single trophic level but did not hold
in many situations with more natural trophic structure. In general, b
asal species in a food web tended to follow the IDH, whereas competito
rs at top trophic levels did not. Additional analyses indicated that o
utside immigration interacted with trophic structure to produce widely
differing predictions about the consequences of disturbance and that
density-dependent disturbance events could recapture the IDH in some m
ultiple trophic level situations. Model predictions matched the result
s of empirical studies to date: the IDH has generally been supported f
or species competing for nondynamic basal resources but not for mobile
aquatic invertebrates at higher trophic levels. The model analysis al
so verified basic predictions of verbal models addressing the effects
of physical stress. Three different aspects of disturbance and their c
ontributions to species coexistence were identified: changes in averag
e mortality rates, changes in temporal variability, and changes in spa
tial heterogeneity. The results indicate that the IDH should be applie
d with caution to real multitrophic communities.