REPERFUSION INJURY AFTER FOCAL CEREBRAL-ISCHEMIA - THE ROLE OF INFLAMMATION AND THE THERAPEUTIC HORIZON

Citation
Wc. Jean et al., REPERFUSION INJURY AFTER FOCAL CEREBRAL-ISCHEMIA - THE ROLE OF INFLAMMATION AND THE THERAPEUTIC HORIZON, Neurosurgery, 43(6), 1998, pp. 1382-1396
Citations number
201
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Clinical Neurology
Journal title
ISSN journal
0148396X
Volume
43
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1382 - 1396
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-396X(1998)43:6<1382:RIAFC->2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
RECENT EVIDENCE INDICATES that thrombolysis may be an effective therap y for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. However, the reperfusion of ischemic brain comes with a price. In clinical trials, patients tr eated with thrombolytic therapy have shown a 6% rate of intracerebral hemorrhage, which was balanced against a 30% improvement in functional outcome over controls. Destruction of the microvasculature and extens ion of the infarct area occur after cerebral reperfusion. We have revi ewed the existing data indicating that an inflammatory response occurr ing after the reestablishment of circulation has a causative role in t his reperfusion injury. The recruitment of neutrophils to the area of ischemia, the first step to inflammation, involves the coordinated app earance of multiple proteins. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and in tegrins are adhesion molecules that are up-regulated in endothelial ce lls and leukocytes. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1, and pl atelet-activating factor also participate in leukocyte accumulation an d subsequent activation. Therapies that interfere with the functions o f these factors have shown promise in reducing reperfusion injury and infarct extension in the experimental setting. They may prove to be us eful adjuncts to thrombolytic therapy in the treatment of acute ischem ic stroke.