THE ACTION PROFILE OF LISPRO IS NOT BLUNTED BY MIXING IN THE SYRINGE WITH NPH INSULIN

Citation
Se. Joseph et al., THE ACTION PROFILE OF LISPRO IS NOT BLUNTED BY MIXING IN THE SYRINGE WITH NPH INSULIN, Diabetes care, 21(12), 1998, pp. 2098-2102
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
Journal title
ISSN journal
01495992
Volume
21
Issue
12
Year of publication
1998
Pages
2098 - 2102
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-5992(1998)21:12<2098:TAPOLI>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
OBJECTIVE - To assess the effect of mixing the insulin analog lispro ( Humalog) with NPH (Humulin I) before injection on lispro's fast, short action profile.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 12 healthy vo lunteers received subcutaneous abdominal injections of 0.1 U/kg regula r insulin and 0.2 U/kg NPH insulin as follows: lispro and NPH injected separately (treatment group A), lispro and NPH mixed in the syringe u p to 2 min before single injection (treatment group B), and human regu lar insulin and NPH mixed and injected as in group B (treatment group C), on separate occasions, in random order. Plasma glucose was maintai ned for 12 h by intravenous 20% glucose. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacod ynamic parameters were compared by analysis of variance for repeated m easures. RESULTS - Peak plasma insulin levels (2.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.6 ng/ml, P = 0.075), total glucose infused (121.5 /- 32.8 vs. 135.0 +/- 49.0 vs. 117.3 +/- 39.9 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1), P = 0.53), and maximum glucose infusion rate (GIR(max)) (8.3 +/- 0.9 vs . 8.0 +/- 1.7 vs. 7.1 +/- 2.4 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1), P = 0.65) were no t significantly different between treatments. The times until peak ins ulin concentrations were similar in treatment groups A and B, but sign ificantly shorter than in treatment group C (0.9 +/- 0.3 and 1.2 +/- 0 .2 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.4 h, respectively, P = 0.042). The times until GIR(ma x) were also not different (113.9 +/- 41 and 122.0 +/- 45 vs. 209.0 +/ - 51.3 min, , respectively, P = 0.002). The glucose infusion rate (GIR ) then fell to 50% GIR(max) more quickly in treatment groups A and B t han in treatment group C (239.9 +/- 40.5 vs. 292.4 +/- 133.3 vs. 399.5 +/- 78.3, respectively, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS - The action profile of lispro is not attenuated by mixing lispro with NPH in the syringe i mmediately before injection. The advantages are available to those ind ividuals who need to combine types of insulin before injection to achi eve optimal diabetes control.