Clinical islet transplantation is potentially the treatment of choice
for people with type I diabetes. Rates of insulin independence in isle
t transplant recipients are disappointingly low, and the relative cont
ribution of the rejection response compared,vith the loss of islet fun
ction is still unclear, We have compared the mixed lymphocyte islet co
culture (MLIC) with the mixed lymphocyte acinar cell coculture (MLAC)
and the mixed lymphocyte response (MLR) as in vitro models of allograf
t rejection to MHC and tissue-specific antigens expressed by human isl
ets and acinar cells. The reduced number of MHC class II antigen-posit
ive cells in islets and acinar tissue compared to those in the stimula
tor lymphocyte population of the MLR, correlated with a reduced prolif
erative response in the MLIC and MLAC, Enhancement of MHC class II ant
igen expression by islets using TNF alpha and IFN gamma did not increa
se their stimulatory capacity in the islet cocultures, which may have
been due to a corresponding absence of B7 expression. The lack of T ce
ll proliferation to acinar cells despite cytokine-induced enhancement
of MHC class II expression and detectable B7 expression appeared to be
due to the inhibitory effect of exocrine enzymes on lymphocyte prolif
eration. In conclusion, we suggest that a rejection response to islets
and acinar tissue is possible due to the accompanying MHC class II-po
sitive cells and that, in this model, islet and acinar-specific antige
ns do not significantly contribute to that response. Acinar cells may
have the potential to stimulate lymphocytes directly, but this was not
evident by proliferation in the MLAC, Rejection appears to contribute
to the low survival rate of human islet allografts, but it is unlikel
y that this is the sole explanation, and other factors should be consi
dered. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.