INTERACTIVE CANOPIES FOR A CLIMATE MODEL

Citation
Re. Dickinson et al., INTERACTIVE CANOPIES FOR A CLIMATE MODEL, Journal of climate, 11(11), 1998, pp. 2823-2836
Citations number
80
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
08948755
Volume
11
Issue
11
Year of publication
1998
Pages
2823 - 2836
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-8755(1998)11:11<2823:ICFACM>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Climate models depend on evapotranspiration from models of plant stoma tal resistance and leaf cover, and hence they depend on a description of the response of leaf cover to temperature and soil moisture. Such a description is derived as an addition to the Biosphere-Atmosphere Tra nsfer Scheme and tested by simulations in a climate model. Rules for c arbon uptake, allocation between leaves, fine roots, and wood, and los s terms from respiration, leaf, and root turnover and cold and drought stress, are used to infer the seasonal growth of leaf area as needed in a climate model, and to provide carbon fluxes (assuming also a simp le soil carbon model) and net primary productivity. The scheme is test ed in an Il-yr integration with the NCAR CCM3 climate model. After a s pinup period of several years, the model equilibrates to a seasonal cy cle plus some interannual variability. Effects of the latter are notic eable for the Amazon. Overall, drought stress has nearly as large an e ffect on leaf mortality as cold stress. The leaf areas agree on averag e with those inferred from Normalized Difference Vegetation Index alth ough some individual systems are either too high (grass and crops) or too low (deciduous needleleaf in Siberia) compared to the satellite da ta. Evergreen needleleaf forests have significantly smaller annual ran ge and later phase than indicated by the data. The interactive paramet erization increases temperatures and reduces evapotranspiration and pr ecipitation compared to the control over the extratropical Northern He misphere summer. This interactive leaf model may serve not only to pro vide feedbacks between vegetation and the climate model, but also to d iagnose shortcomings of a climate model simulation from the viewpoint of its impact on the biosphere.