Eys. Chao et al., ENHANCEMENT OF FRACTURE-HEALING BY MECHANICAL AND SURGICAL INTERVENTION, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (355), 1998, pp. 163-178
Mechanical modulation of bone fracture repair and restoration to its s
tructural strength must rely on the fundamental physical concept of re
modeling according to the type of stress applied to immature or undiff
erentiated tissue. This article proposes the possible mechanisms of in
teraction between physical factors and cellular responses in healing l
ong bone fractures and speculates on the advantages and limitations of
different experimental models in evaluating these interactions. A rev
ised classification system of fracture union types based on histomorph
ologic characteristics is introduced here as a reference standard in t
he studies of possible accelerating factors. Bone fracture union can f
ollow more than one or two pathways, with various combinations of bone
formation mechanisms, whereas there may be only one bone remodeling p
rinciple. There are definite mechanical and operative interventions th
at can provide effective enhancement to fracture healing. However, dif
ferent intervention may limit its association to a specific healing me
chanism. The key element in establishing these interactions is definin
g the precise cellular and molecular mechanisms in a quantitative mann
er. This can be achieved best by interdisciplinary research collaborat
ions working on a higher level of expertise in each related field usin
g standardized experimental models. Not only a basic understanding of
the associated cellular reactions is necessary, but also the specific
forms of mechanical stimulation, the dose effect, and its application
timing must be determined and validated. Without this basic research e
ffort, it would be difficult to transform such an augmentational modal
ity into effective and reliable therapeutic regimens for clinical appl
ication. Furthermore, successful fracture repair enhancement must have
proper new bone formation maintenance and remodeling through physiolo
gic loading, or the initial stimulation process may be short lived and
unable to reestablish the required biomechanical strength of the long
bone. Finally, there is no substitute for a well organized and carefu
lly controlled prospective clinical trial in establishing the validity
of any bone fracture healing enhancement modality, regardless of its
nature and form of application.