Bb. Singh et al., INCIDENCE OF PREMENSTRUAL-SYNDROME AND REMEDY USAGE - A NATIONAL PROBABILITY SAMPLE STUDY, Alternative therapies in health and medicine, 4(3), 1998, pp. 75-79
Context Premenstrual syndrome is believed to affect 30% to 80% of wome
n. Studies in various cultures have used a variety of methodologies to
determine prevalence, symptom profile, and effectiveness of available
treatments. This study was designed to provide information an inciden
ce of PMS and therapies used based on a national probability sample of
US women. Method In 1996 a national probability sample (N = 1052) oJ
women aged 21 to 64 years was surveyed by telephone using random digit
dial methods. The survey included demographic information, questions
concerning respondent knowledge of premenstrual syndrome, incidence ra
tes of common premenstrual syndrome symptoms, and any remedies that we
re used to control the symptoms. Results Forty-one percent of the wome
n responded ''yes'' to the question, ''Do you suffer from premenstrual
syndrome?'' An additional 17% indicated that they experienced symptom
s prior to their menstrual cycle that are commonly associated with pre
menstrual syndrome (eg, pain, bloating, feeling more emotional, weight
gain, food cravings), though without associating these symptoms with
premenstrual syndrome explicitly. The most frequently noted severe sym
ptom was that of ''[feeling] more emotional.'' Of those reporting prem
enstrual syndrome symptoms, approximately 42% took either prescription
or over-the-counter medications to relieve them. Eighty percent of th
e women taking any type of medication relied on over-the-counter medic
ations. Prescription drug use for premenstrual syndrome symptoms focus
ed on medications to control pain; hormone supplements were the second
most frequently prescribed drugs. Fewer than 3% of the respondents us
ed prescription medications. Respondents were asked to indicate whethe
r they had used a complementary medical therapy to control symptoms. E
xercise was used most frequently (18%), and acupuncture was the least
frequently used. Although only a small percentage of women used comple
mentary therapies, for most of these therapies a near-perfect concorda
nce was found between usage and belief in efficacy. Conclusions Women
were aware of symptoms related to premenstrual syndrome more frequentl
y than they recognized a formalized medical syndrome. Less than half o
f the women reporting symptoms had taken either over-the-counter or pr
escription drugs. Those who tried complementary therapies generally fo
und them to be effective.