CORRELATION BETWEEN SYMPTOM FATIGUE AND MUSCULAR FATIGUE IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS

Authors
Citation
J. Iriarte, CORRELATION BETWEEN SYMPTOM FATIGUE AND MUSCULAR FATIGUE IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS, European journal of neurology, 5(6), 1998, pp. 579-585
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Clinical Neurology
ISSN journal
13515101
Volume
5
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
579 - 585
Database
ISI
SICI code
1351-5101(1998)5:6<579:CBSFAM>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The symptom of fatigue is a frequent complaint in multiple sclerosis ( MS) patients. Signs of fatigability have been documented in these pati ents as well. However, correlation with signs of objective fatigue had not been clarified in MS. The aim of this study was to ascertain the existence of muscular fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients, and to f ind out if there is a correlation between the subjective symptom of fa tigue and muscular fatigue. Fifty MS patients and 50 age and sex match ed volunteers were studied using isometric and isotonic tests using th e dominant hand. Strength was studied in the baseline condition and al so after recovery of either an isotonic (experiment A) or isometric ef fort (experiment B), Maximum strength, strength in relationship to wei ght, slope of fatigability in 11 consecutive contractions, and strengt h and duration of a maximum effort were calculated. Fatigue as a sympt om was measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Fatigue Descriptive Scale (FDS). Non-parametric techniques were used for the statistical analysis. Patients with MS had less isometric and isotonic strength, but the recovery was the same as recovery in the control gr oup. There was a negative linear correlation between the symptom of fa tigue and the baseline strength. In conclusion, this study supports th e existence of signs of muscular fatigue in MS patients. However, the recovery after exercise is normal. The correlation between the baselin e scores in strength and the symptom of fatigue suggest that the same cause (probably pyramidal deficits) may be involved in both of them. E ur J Neurol 5:579-585 (C) 1998 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.