DESCRIBING PATIENTS NORMAL TISSUE-REACTIONS - CONCERNING THE POSSIBILITY OF INDIVIDUALIZING RADIOTHERAPY DOSE PRESCRIPTIONS BASED ON POTENTIAL PREDICTIVE ASSAYS OF NORMAL TISSUE RADIOSENSITIVITY
Ng. Burnet et al., DESCRIBING PATIENTS NORMAL TISSUE-REACTIONS - CONCERNING THE POSSIBILITY OF INDIVIDUALIZING RADIOTHERAPY DOSE PRESCRIPTIONS BASED ON POTENTIAL PREDICTIVE ASSAYS OF NORMAL TISSUE RADIOSENSITIVITY, International journal of cancer, 79(6), 1998, pp. 606-613
Clinical radiotherapeutic doses are limited by the tolerance of normal
tissues. Patients given a standard treatment exhibit a range of norma
l tissue reactions, and a better understanding of this individual vari
ation might allow for individualisation of radiotherapeutic prescripti
ons, with consequent improvement in the therapeutic ratio. At present,
there is no simple way to describe normal tissue reactions, which ham
pers communication between clinic and laboratory and between groups fr
om different centres. There is also no method for comparing the severi
ty of reactions in different normal tissues. This arises largely becau
se there is no definition of a ''normal'' reaction, an ''extreme'' rea
ction or the particular term ''over-reactor'' (OR). This report propos
es definitions for these terms, as well as a simple terminology for de
scribing normal tissue reactions in patients having radiotherapy. The
''normal'' range represents the individual variation in normal tissue
reactions amongst large numbers of patients treated in the same way wh
ich is within clinically acceptable limits. The term ''OR'' is applied
to an individual whose reaction is more severe than the normal range
but also implies that this forced a major change in the radiotherapeut
ic prescription or that the reactions were very severe or fatal. A ''s
evere OR'' would develop serious problems with a typical radical dose,
while an ''extreme OR'' would have such difficulties at a much lower
dose. To describe the normal range, a numerical scale is suggested, fr
om I to 5, resistant to sensitive. The term ''highly radiosensitive''
(HR) is suggested for category 5. An ''informal'' relative scale, as s
uggested here, is quick and simple. It should allow comparison between
different hospitals, compensate for differences in radiotherapeutic d
ose and technique and allow comparison of reactions between different
anatomical sites. It should be adequate for discriminating patients at
the extremes of the normal range from those at the centre. It is hope
d that the definitions and terminology proposed here will aid communic
ation in the field of predictive testing of normal tissue radiosensiti
vity. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.