To determine the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAG) in the mana
gement of cervical carcinoma Stage IB2 (tumor diameter >4 cm), we revi
ewed 52 surgically treated patients diagnosed between January 1987 and
December 1993. There were 20 patients treated with preoperative neoad
juvant chemotherapy and 32 treated by primary radical hysterectomy. Me
an tumor diameter was significantly larger in the neoadjuvant, compare
d with the primary surgery group (6.5+/-1.8 vs 5.4+/-0.7, P=0.003). In
the NAC group, 5 of 20 patients were treated with three courses of ci
splatin, methotrexate, and bleomycin every 21 days, whereas 15 of 20 p
atients received three courses of cisplatin, vincristine, and bleomyci
n every 10 days. Postoperative adjuvant therapy consisting of either r
adiation or chemotherapy was employed in 13/ 20 patients (65%) in the
NAC group and 20/32 patients (63%) in the primary surgical group. At a
median follow-up of 52.5 months, 4/20 patients (20%) in the NAC group
recurred vs 11/32 (34%) in the primary surgery group. The overall res
ponse rate to NAC was 90%, with 2/20 complete clinical responders and
16/20 partial responders. High-risk pathologic factors were less commo
nly observed in the NAC group when compared with the primary surgical
group with the incidence of nodal metastases, positive vascular space
involvement, undiagnosed parametrial disease, and greater than or equa
l to 75% depth of invasion observed in 10.0% vs 37.5%, 20.0% vs 46.9%,
0.0% vs 15.6%, and 30.0% vs 68.8%, respectively. No differences were
noted in operative time or blood loss. Cox proportional-hazards analys
is indicated that the most significant prognostic factor was depth of
invasion. Although the patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy
had significantly larger tumors at baseline, their 5-year survival rat
e was slightly higher than that of the primary surgery group (80.0% vs
68.7%, P=0.162). Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, despite
having significantly larger pretreatment tumors, had fewer high-risk
pathologic factors, postoperatively. Although this was a small, nonran
domized study, the relative improvement in pathologic response and lon
gterm outcome associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was encouraging
. This highlights the need for a prospective randomized clinical trial
to establish whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy can significantly impro
ve the long-term outcome of women with Stage IB2 squamous cell carcino
ma of the cervix. (C) 1997 Academic Press.