INTERCOMPARISON AMONG CHAMBER, TOWER, AND AIRCRAFT NET CO2 AND ENERGYFLUXES MEASURED DURING THE ARCTIC SYSTEM SCIENCE LAND-ATMOSPHERE-ICE INTERACTIONS (ARCSS-LAII) FLUX STUDY
Wc. Oechel et al., INTERCOMPARISON AMONG CHAMBER, TOWER, AND AIRCRAFT NET CO2 AND ENERGYFLUXES MEASURED DURING THE ARCTIC SYSTEM SCIENCE LAND-ATMOSPHERE-ICE INTERACTIONS (ARCSS-LAII) FLUX STUDY, J GEO RES-A, 103(D22), 1998, pp. 28993-29003
Measurements of net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) and energy balance we
re made using chamber-, tower-, and aircraft-based measurement techniq
ues in Alaskan arctic tundra ecosystems during the 1994-1995 growing s
easons (June-August). One of our objectives was to quantify the interr
elationships between the NEE and the energy balance measurements made
from different sampling techniques. Qualitative and quantitative inter
comparisons revealed that on average the correspondence between the ma
ss and energy fluxes measured by these sampling methods was good despi
te potential spatial and temporal mismatches in sampling scale. Quanti
tative comparisons using least squares linear regression analyses with
the tower-based measurements of NEE as the independent variable indic
ate that the chamber- and aircraft-based NEE measurements were general
ly lower relative to the tower-based measurements (slope = 0.76-0.86).
Similarly, tower-aircraft comparisons of latent (L-e) and sensible (H
) heat exchange indicated that the aircraft-based measurements were lo
wer than the tower-based measurements (slope = 0.72-0.80). Qualitative
comparisons, however, indicate that the correspondence among the cham
ber-, tower-: and aircraft-measured fluxes varied both seasonally and
interannually, suggesting the lack of a consistent bias between the sa
mpling techniques. The results suggest that differences observed betwe
en the chamber, tower, and aircraft flux measurements were primarily d
ue to the failure to account for the spatial distribution of surface t
ypes in the tower and aircraft sampling footprint, problems involved i
n the comparison of temporal and spatial averages, and temporal (e.g.,
seasonal and interannual) variance in rates of mass and energy flux f
or a given point. Other potential sources of variance include the unde
restimation of nocturnal NEE by the tower-based eddy covariance system
, and the periodic occurrence of an elevated CO2 plume in the atmosphe
re over the Prudhoe Bay oil field. Even with these potential sources o
f variation, the results reveal that the various methods,give comparab
le estimates of NEE and energy flux within a range of temporal or spat
ial variability.