Mw. Hungerford et al., SURFACE REPLACEMENT HEMIARTHROPLASTY FOR THE TREATMENT OF OSTEONECROSIS OF THE FEMORAL-HEAD, Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume (Print ed.), 80A(11), 1998, pp. 1656-1664
We reviewed the results of thirty-three femoral resurfacing procedures
in twenty-five patients who had stage-III or early stage-IV osteonecr
osis of the femoral head according to the classification system of Fic
at and Arlet. There were no perioperative complications. Thirty hip pr
ostheses (91 percent) survived for a minimum of five years. At a mean
of 10.5 years (range, four to fourteen years) postoperatively, sixteen
(62 percent) of the twenty-six hips with stage-III disease had a good
or excellent Harris hip score. Four of the seven hips with stage-IV d
isease did not have or need a total hip arthroplasty, Overall, twenty
hips (61 percent) had a good or excellent result according to the scor
ing system of Harris, and thirteen (39 percent) had a fair or poor res
ult and subsequently had or needed a total hip arthroplasty, The mean
interval between the hemiarthroplasty and the total hip arthroplasty w
as sixty months (range, thirty-six to 136 months). These thirteen hips
all had a successful clinical result (a Harris hip score of at least
80 points) at a mean of thirty months (range, twenty-four to seventy-t
wo months) after the total hip arthroplasty: The results of the presen
t study suggest that resurfacing of the femoral head can be a successf
ul interim procedure for the management of patients who have Ficat and
Arlet stage-III or early stage-IV disease with a large lesion that is
not amenable to other treatment options except total hip arthroplasty
.