A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL EVALUATING THE EFFICACYOF URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID IN PREVENTION OF LIVER-TRANSPLANT REJECTION

Citation
Jf. Fleckenstein et al., A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL EVALUATING THE EFFICACYOF URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID IN PREVENTION OF LIVER-TRANSPLANT REJECTION, Liver transplantation and surgery, 4(4), 1998, pp. 276-279
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology",Surgery,Transplantation
ISSN journal
10743022
Volume
4
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
276 - 279
Database
ISI
SICI code
1074-3022(1998)4:4<276:APRDTE>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Acute cellular rejection (ACR) after orthotopic liver transplantation occurs in 50% to 80% of patients despite the recent advances in immuno suppressive therapy. Adjuvant use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is th eoretically attractive, but studies have shown conflicting results. In this randomized, controlled study, we evaluated the efficacy of UDCA in reduction of the incidence of ACR, Thirty patients were randomized to receive either UDCA (15 mg/kg) or placebo in addition to the standa rd triple-drug regimen; 14 patients received UDCA, and the rest receiv ed placebo, for 3 to 6 months. The diagnosis of ACR was based on histo logic criteria. Three patients withdrew from the study within 1 month of therapy, all because of capsule size. There was no difference in! t he total incidence of ACR between the placebo and UDCA groups, with 12 and 11 episodes within 6 months, respectively; the overall incidence of rejection was 77%. There were also no differences in the incidence of recurrent rejection, in the number of rejection episodes occurring after 5 days of therapy, or in the use of OKT3. There was no differenc e in 1-year survival between groups. This study shows that adjuvant th erapy with UDCA in addition to standard triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy does not reduce the incidence of ACR. Copyright (C) 1998 by th e American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.