Sm. Rosentreter et al., RESPONSE OF RETINAL GANGLION-CELL AXONS TO STRIPED LINEAR GRADIENTS OF REPELLENT GUIDANCE MOLECULES, Journal of neurobiology, 37(4), 1998, pp. 541-562
Although molecular gradients have long been postulated to play a role
in the development of topographic projections in the nervous system, r
elatively little is known about how axons evaluate gradients. Do growt
h cones respond to concentration or to slope? Do they react suddenly o
r gradually? Is there adaptation? In the developing retinotectal syste
m, temporal retinal ganglion cell axons have previously been shown to
avoid repellent cell-surface activities distributed in gradients acros
s the optic tectum. We confronted temporal retinal axons with precisel
y formed striped linear gradients of repellent tectal membranes and of
two candidate repellent molecules, ephrin-A2 and -A5. Axons entered g
radient stripes independently of their slope and extended unhindered i
n the uphill direction until they suddenly avoided an apparent thresho
ld concentration of repellent material that was independent of slope.
This: critical concentration was similar in both linear and nonlinear
gradients, and hence independent of gradient shape. When gradients of
identical slope were formed on different basal levels of repellent mat
erial, axons grew uphill for a fixed increment of concentration, possi
bly measured from the lowest point of the gradient, rather than up to
a fixed absolute concentration. The speed of growth cones was not affe
cted by repellent unstriped gradients below the critical concentration
level. Similar results were found with membranes from cell lines stab
ly transfected with either ephrin-A5 or ephrin-A2, two previously iden
tified growth cone repellent cell-surface proteins. These data suggest
that growth cones or axons can integrate guidance information over la
rge distances, probably by a combined memory and adaptation mechanism,
(C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.