Theoretical models of ductile fracture are reviewed in terms of experi
mental results from metallurgical studies of ductile fracture in metal
s and alloys. It is shown that the plastic limit-load model, which is
based on a criterion of void coalescence by internal microscopic necki
ng of the intervoid matrix, is fully consistent with scanning electron
microscope (SEM) observations of both the ductile-fracture surface an
d the microstructure immediately adjacent to the fracture surface. On
the other hand, the dilational-plastic models of ductile fracture, whi
ch are based on the dilational-growth of spherical voids to some arbit
rary critical void-volume fraction, are inconsistent with the microstr
uctural observations of ductile fracture. This inconsistency between t
he dilational-plastic models and experimental results is shown to be t
he combined effect of neglecting the controlling influence of extensio
nal void-growth and the failure to incorporate a physically realistic
criterion of void coalescence. The problems of modelling the ductile c
rack-growth process by both analytical and numerical (finite element)
studies, where problems of uniqueness of the plastic velocity field ma
y occur, are also considered. The limitations of the finite-element me
thod in modelling void-coalescence problems, where the equations of pl
asticity are of second-order hyperbolic form, are also discussed.