TESTING OF PEATS FOR REMOVAL OF ODORS FROM LIQUID SWINE MANURE

Citation
Am. Rizzuti et al., TESTING OF PEATS FOR REMOVAL OF ODORS FROM LIQUID SWINE MANURE, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A: Environmental science and engineering, 33(8), 1998, pp. 1719-1739
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences","Engineering, Environmental
ISSN journal
10934529
Volume
33
Issue
8
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1719 - 1739
Database
ISI
SICI code
1093-4529(1998)33:8<1719:TOPFRO>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
This paper reports on research designed to investigate the capacities of different kinds of peat to remove odor-causing compounds from liqui d swine manure (LSM). Two experiments were conducted. In experiment #1 , five different peat types (both wet and dry) representing a wide ran ge of properties were tested. Eight percent slurries (of peat/LSM) wer e measured for odor changes at 6, 24, and 96 hours using odor panel an d GC/FID analysis. Experiment #2 was designed to determine more precis ely the kinds of odor-causing compounds that were changing during trea tment. Two extremely different wet peat types were tested in 8 percent slurries after 24 hours of treatment. Odor changes were evaluated usi ng both an odor panel and GC/MS, head-space, solid-phase, microextract ion (HSM).The GC/FID and odor panel results indicated that wet peats w ere much more effective in removing odor-causing compounds from LSM th an were dry pests. Wet pests significantly reduced the LSM odor intens ity after 6 hours of treatment, and completely eliminated odors after the 24 hour treatment. The results from the GC/MS HSM method (experime nt #2) confirmed the results from experiment #1 and also, allowed us t o more precisely identify the specific odor-causing compounds being re duced and to distinguish specific changes in these compounds between p eat types. Of the 23 malodorous compounds identified in experiment #2, all showed significant reductions; however, one peat was better at re ducing 10 of these, while the wet North Carolina peat was better at re ducing 9 others. These results suggest that improvements in odor remov al efficiency and costs can be achieved by selection of specific peat types for a specific LSM site.