SAFETY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF A COMBINED DIPHTHERIA-TETANUS-ACELLULAR PERTUSSIS-INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINE-HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAE TYPE-B VACCINE ADMINISTERED AT 2-4-6-13 OR 3-5-12 MONTHS OF AGE
Rm. Carlsson et al., SAFETY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF A COMBINED DIPHTHERIA-TETANUS-ACELLULAR PERTUSSIS-INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINE-HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAE TYPE-B VACCINE ADMINISTERED AT 2-4-6-13 OR 3-5-12 MONTHS OF AGE, The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 17(11), 1998, pp. 1026-1033
Methods. In an open randomized study we compared the safety and immuno
genicity of two schedules for priming and booster vaccinations of infa
nts. A pentavalent combination vaccine, including a lyophilized Haemop
hilus influenzae type b-tetanus toroid conjugate vaccine reconstituted
with a liquid diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (pertussis tor
oid and filamentous hemagglutinin) and inactivated polio vaccine (DTaP
-IPV/Act-HIB (R); Pasteur Merieux Connaught, Lyon, France) was adminis
tered to 236 Swedish infants either at 2, 4 and 6 months or at 3 and 5
months, and a booster dose was administered 7 months after the last p
rimary dose. Adverse events were monitored by diaries for 3 days after
each vaccination and by questions at the ensuing visits. Antibodies a
gainst the different vaccine components were analyzed after the primar
y series of vaccinations, before and after the booster injections. Res
ults. There were no serious adverse reactions, and the rates of febril
e events and local reactions were low in both groups. The three dose p
rimary schedule induced higher geometric mean concentrations for all a
ntigens than did the two dose schedule, but there were no differences
between the groups in proportions with protective antibody titers agai
nst diphtheria, tetanus, Hib and polio or in proportions with certain
defined levels of pertussis antibodies. Prebooster results showed a si
milar pattern, with the exception that the group primed with three inj
ections showed higher proportions of infants with detectable antibodie
s against poliovirus types 1 and 3. After booster vaccinations there w
ere no differences between the two schedules in geometric mean or in p
roportions with antibodies above defined antibody concentrations, indi
cating effective priming from both primary series of vaccinations. Con
clusion. The combined vaccine DTaP-IPV/ Act-HIB (R) vaccine was equall
y safe and immunogenic when administered according to both time schedu
les studied.