Studies of risk communication examining channels emphasize the mass ve
rsus interpersonal dichotomy. This approach has not produced entirely
consistent results and has neglected to consider other potential attri
butes of channels. This article presents and evaluates a model featuri
ng cost and expected utility as fundamental aspects of communication c
hannels. Within a case involving risk communication, people are shown
to relate channel cost and expected utility to their evaluation of cha
nnel usefulness. Recommendations are made for how these concepts might
be developed in future research.