Objective: To provide and evaluate telemedicine services for rural phy
sicians and patients in Nova Scotia. Materials and Methods: As a pilot
project, three telemedicine services (videoconference continuing medi
cal education [CME], teledermatology, and teleradiology) were provided
to four hospitals in Nova Scotia communities. All four sites received
CME (a total of 269 physicians, 53 other health care professionals);
three sites received teledermatology (66 consultations), and two sites
received teleradiology (808 radiologic examinations). At the consulti
ng site, 12 faculty members presented 24 one-hour videoconferences, an
d there was one consulting radiologist and dermatologist. Each service
was evaluated independently. Methods included participant questionnai
res; focus groups; numbers and categories of participants or examinati
ons; comparison of operational costs, capitol costs (teledermatology a
nd teleradiology), and travel costs (CME); technical assessments of ha
rdware, software, and telecommunications; assessment of clinical diagn
ostic procedures (teledermatology); and comparative study of original
and digitized films (teleradiology). Results: Despite growing pains, t
he technologies effectively provided the three services: the services
were acceptable to referring and consulting physicians and patients. I
mprovements in patient care and outcomes comparable to those of tradit
ional methods were demonstrated in teleradiology and teledermatology,
especially for emergencies. Physician access to CME and patient access
to dermatology consultation services were improved. Financial savings
were demonstrated for CME, but further investigation is required to d
etermine the savings attributable to teleradiology and teledermatology
. Conclusions: The telemedicine services supported rural physicians, t
heir patients, and their communities. Although telemedicine is not a p
anacea for all concerns of rural physicians, the pilot project provide
d a strong foundation for further development and study.