A STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANIMAL AND NUTRITIONAL FACTORS INFLUENCING CONCENTRATIONS OF MILK UREA NITROGEN

Citation
Ga. Broderick et Mk. Clayton, A STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANIMAL AND NUTRITIONAL FACTORS INFLUENCING CONCENTRATIONS OF MILK UREA NITROGEN, Journal of dairy science, 80(11), 1997, pp. 2964-2971
Citations number
35
Journal title
ISSN journal
00220302
Volume
80
Issue
11
Year of publication
1997
Pages
2964 - 2971
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0302(1997)80:11<2964:ASEOAA>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Data from 35 trials with 482 lactating cows fed 106 diets were used to study the effects of animal and dietary factors on the relationship b etween milk and blood urea N and the value of milk urea N in the asses sment of protein status. In two trials, urea N in whole blood and in b lood plasma were closely related (r(2) = 0.952); the slope was not sig nificantly different from 1.0, and the intercept was not significantly different from 0. Regression of milk urea N on blood urea N with a mi xed effects model using all 2231 observations yielded the equation: mi lk urea N (milligrams of N per deciliter) = 0.620 x blood urea N (mill igrams of N per deciliter) + 4.75 (r(2) = 0.842); this model accounted for a significant interaction of cow and blood urea N. Single factors that yielded significant regressions on milk urea N with the mixed ef fects models were dietary crude protein (CP) (percentage of dry matter ; r(2) = 0.839), dietary CP per megacalorie of net energy for lactatio n (NEL) (r(2) = 0.833), excess N intake (r(2) = 0.772), N efficiency ( r(2) = 0.626), and ruminal NH3 (r(2) = 0.574). When all factors were a nalyzed at once, 12 were significant in a mixed effects model. Blood u rea N, body weight, yield of fat-corrected milk, dietary CP content, e xcess N intake, dry matter intake, and days in milk were positively re lated to milk urea N, and parity, milk and fat yield, dietary CP per u nit of NEL content, and NEL intake were negatively related to milk ure a N. In one trial, the mean urea concentration was 35 times greater in urine than in milk; lower proportions of total urea excretion in milk were observed in the a.m. sampling (1.8%) than in the p.m. sampling ( 3.3%). Measuring urea N in a composite milk sample from the whole day substantially improved reliability of data. The number of cows fed a s pecific diet that must be sampled to determine mean milk urea N within 95% confidence intervals with half widths of 1.0 and 2.0 mg of N/dl w as estimated to be 16 and 4, respectively.