In this article I describe some aspects of Joseph Anderson's theory of
film, and evaluate these in the context of ecological theory. My anal
ysis of Anderson's interpretation of the work of James Gibson leads me
to conclude that there are unresolved issues in Gibson's theory of de
pictions (still and moving pictures). I suggest that some of these iss
ues might be clarified through a closer consideration of perception as
an exploratory act and of film as an instrument that guides explorati
on. In the process of developing this argument, I provide suggestions
for empirical research that might be useful in evaluating film theorie
s.