Jm. Wo et al., DUAL-CHANNEL AMBULATORY ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING - A USEFUL DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL, Digestive diseases and sciences, 42(11), 1997, pp. 2222-2226
Ambulatory pH monitoring of the distal esophagus is the most accurate
diagnostic study for patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux d
isease (GERD). The measurement of proximal esophageal acid exposure ti
me may be useful in patients with atypical reflux symptoms. The aim of
this study is to evaluate if proximal esophageal pH monitoring provid
es useful information beyond that learned with distal esophageal pH mo
nitoring. We routinely performed dual-channel pH monitoring with pH el
ectrodes positioned at 20 and 5 cm above the manometric lower esophage
al sphincter from January 1992 to August 1995. All patients scored the
ir esophageal symptoms from zero (none) to four (severe). We compared
proximal esophageal reflux (PR) in patients with typical symptoms (ie,
heartburn, regurgitation) and in patients with atypical symptoms (ie,
chest pain, cough, hoarseness, and asthma). We compared symptom profi
les between patients with and without PR. We reviewed our experience i
n patients with abnormal PR, but with a normal amount of distal esopha
geal reflux (DR). We studied 441 consecutive patients. There were no s
ignificant differences in PR between patients with typical and atypica
l symptoms. There were no differences in symptom profiles between pati
ents with normal and abnormal PR. There were no differences of PR betw
een the different atypical symptoms. PR did not correlate with the sev
erity of the patient's symptoms. PR correlated well only with DR. Twen
ty-four patients had isolated abnormal PR, but only six patients impro
ved with antireflux therapy. We conclude that routine ambulatory esoph
ageal pH monitoring of the proximal esophagus appears to be of little
value. The decision to offer patients an empiric trial of antireflux t
herapy for suspected GERD should not be based on the presence or absen
ce of PR.