Extracts of an argument which defended the assassination of the popula
r South African leader, Chris Hani, are used to show variability in th
e style of fascist cognition. Such variability, although compatible wi
th current dialogical models of thinking, contradicts the theoretical
predictions of the classical social psychological theory of the author
itarian personality. Furthermore, it undermines this traditional attem
pt to develop a psychological critique of fascism because the emergent
nature of cognitive processing means that a pervasive psychological i
rrationality cannot underlie fascist thinking. In particular, fascists
cannot be described as intolerant of ambiguity. It seems that once ag
ain the postmodern understanding of an emergent self leads to an anti-
critical relativism. In this paper I develop a Bakhtinian understandin
g of cognitive style in order to advance an alternative approach to a
critical social psychology. I argue that research may gain a critical
impulse by analysing forms of utterance in terms of the social languag
es through which they ventriloquate.