Although Michael Polanyi's model of science and his construal of the n
ature of the real are usually thought to be congenial to religion and
although Polanyi himself says that ''the stage on which we thus resume
our full intellectual powers is borrowed from the Christian scheme of
Fall and Redemption'' (Polanyi 1958, 324), theologians have given lit
tle attention to the model of God he presents. The metaphysical and th
eological vision unfolded in part 4 of Personal Knowledge is a thought
ful alternative to materialist versions of neo-Darwinism and provides
a platform for revisiting four long-standing controversies at the inte
rface of science and religion: whether life and mind can be completely
specified in terms of physical analysis, whether nature can be adequa
tely understood without appeal to final causes, whether natural select
ion adequately explains life's diverse forms, and whether knowledge ca
n be fully objectified. Through an exploration of Polanyi's contributi
on to these discussions, we undertake to show not only that his treatm
ent of God as a cosmic field is strikingly original but also chat in r
einstating activity as a metaphysical category, he reconstructs our un
derstanding of our creaturely hope and calling.