MEASURING AMENITY BENEFITS FROM FARMLAND - HEDONIC PRICING VS. CONTINGENT VALUATION

Citation
Rc. Ready et al., MEASURING AMENITY BENEFITS FROM FARMLAND - HEDONIC PRICING VS. CONTINGENT VALUATION, Growth and change, 28(4), 1997, pp. 438-458
Citations number
36
Journal title
ISSN journal
00174815
Volume
28
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
438 - 458
Database
ISI
SICI code
0017-4815(1997)28:4<438:MABFF->2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The amenity value to Kentucky residents from horse farm land was estim ated using both the contingent valuation method and the hedonic pricin g method. The hedonic pricing model included both the housing and labo r markets, A value function estimated from dichotomous choice continge nt valuation responses showed that the value of a change in the level of the horse farm amenity was sensitive to the size of the change, wit h no evidence of value that is independent of the size of the change. The two methods generated estimates of the external benefits from hors e farm land that were within 20 percent of each other.