Clinical neurophysiological assessment frequently requires the compari
son of obtained scores against estimate of premorbid level of function
ing, but only recently has significant attention been turned to object
ive methods to accomplish this objective. Clinical judgment, although
useful in some circumstances, is generally insufficient. Other methods
of estimating premorbid function include demographic regression formu
lae, such as the Barona formula, subtest scatter methods, such as that
suggested by Lezak, and the use of current scores on tests of presuma
bly spared abilities, such as the National Adult Reading Test (NART).
Almost all methods predict to some general level of intellectual funct
ioning rather than to specific neuropsychological skills. This pater r
eviews the suggested methods in terms of the underlying assumptions an
d the available empirical evidence. Suggestions for future research in
clude the development of skill specific predictors as well as investig
ations regarding the relation between predictor accuracy and character
istics of the subject, such as high versus low premorbid functioning i
n the subject. Additionally, there is a great need for methods to pred
ict premorbid functioning in children. (C) 1997 National Academy of Ne
uropsychology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.