Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy

Citation
L. Franchi et al., Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy, AM J ORTHOD, 115(4), 1999, pp. 429-438
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
ISSN journal
08895406 → ACNP
Volume
115
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
429 - 438
Database
ISI
SICI code
0889-5406(199904)115:4<429:TAPEOA>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
This study evaluated the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes induced by acry lic splint Herbst therapy of Class II malocclusion. The treated group compr ised 55 subjects with Class It malocclusion treated with the acrylic splint Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive edgewise therapy. The mean age at Time 1 (immediately before treatment) was 12 years and 10 months +/- 1 y ear and 2 months. The mean age at Time 2 (immediately after debonding of th e Herbst appliance) and Time 3 (posttreatment) was 13 years and 10 months /- 1 year and 2 months and 15 years and 2 months +/- 1 year and 4 months, r espectively, The two control groups were one group of 30 subjects with untr eated Class II malocclusion and another group of 33 subjects with Class I o cclusion. The three groups were homogeneous as to the stage of maturation o f cervical vertebrae at all observation times, A modification of Pancherz's cephalometric analysis was applied to the lateral cephalograms of the thre e groups at Time 1, Time 2, and Time 3, Linear and angular measurements for mandibular dimensions, cranial base angulation, and vertical relationships were added to the original analysis. Differences for all the variables fro m Time 1 to Time 2 (active treatment effects), from Time 2 to Time 3 (postt reatment effects), and from Time 1 to Time 3 (overall treatment effects) we re calculated for the treated group and contrasted to corresponding differe nces of both untreated groups by means of ANOVA (P < .05). The study showed that two thirds of the achieved occlusal correction was due to skeletal ef fects and only one third to dentoalveolar adaptations. Both skeletal and de ntoalveolar effects were due mainly to changes in mandibular structures. A significant amount of relapse in molar relationship occurred during the pos ttreatment period, and this change could be ascribed to the mesial movement of the upper molars.