Y. Collan, The Ebbeson-Tang formula - Theoretical background of an alternative to thedisector in stereologic cell count studies, ANAL QUAN C, 21(2), 1999, pp. 147-150
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the formula of Ebbeson and Tang (FET) with respect t
o the disector (DS) principle.
STUDY DESIGN: The DS principle has been proposed for avoiding cell count bi
as. DS is a slice of tissue, and from it those cells by area are counted in
microscopy; the cells are not in contact with one of the surfaces of the s
lice. The resulting number divided by the thickness of the DS gives an accu
rate figure for cell number by volume. FET applies two sections of differen
t thickness, usually cut adjacent. Cells seen in the sections are counted b
y area, the figures are subtracted from each other, and the difference is d
ivided by the difference between the thicknesses of the sections. The resul
t is cell number by volume: N-V = (N-A1-N-A2)/(t(1)-t(2)).
RESULTS: FET and the DS principle superficially appear different. However,
from a geometric point of view they are based on the same principle. When t
he thickness of the thinner section of FET approaches zero, the situation i
s in all respects equal to the DS principle. The formula for DS can thus be
written: N-V = (N-A1-N-A2)/t(1).
CONCLUSION: The result proves that in principle DS and FET are equivalent m
ethods of counting cell numbers by volume in tissues. FET may be more easil
y applied in histopathology practice because visual comparison of the secti
ons is not necessary. Section thickness, however, has to be measured from v
ertically embedded sections or with scanning laser confocal microscopy. FET
shares the stereologically unbiased character of the DS principle and is i
ndependent of the size and shape of structures counted.