TRAM fat necrosis in a young surgeon's practice: Is it experience, technique, or blood flow?

Citation
Rp. Jewell et Tm. Whitney, TRAM fat necrosis in a young surgeon's practice: Is it experience, technique, or blood flow?, ANN PL SURG, 42(4), 1999, pp. 424-427
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY
ISSN journal
01487043 → ACNP
Volume
42
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
424 - 427
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-7043(199904)42:4<424:TFNIAY>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Fat necrosis, the most common postoperative complication in transverse rect us abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction, affects 12 % to 35% of patients. Despite its common occurrence, few studies have comme nted on the location within the reconstructed breast. Struck by the recurre nt appearance of fat necrosis in the medial breast mound, the authors revie wed retrospectively 50 consecutive single-side TRAM flaps performed by the same surgeon during his first 5 years in practice to evaluate location, fre quency, and severity of fat necrosis, as well as technique (pedicled vs. fr ee), inset method, and patient risk factors. Fat necrosis of any amount was seen in 17 of 50 patients (34%). Significant fat necrosis (>5 cm) and/or i schemic partial flap loss occurred in 11 of 50 patients (22%), appearing in 9 of 30 pedicled flaps and 2 of 20 free TRAM flaps (pedicled vs. free; p<0 .05). Fifteen of 17 ischemic areas occurred within the medial (zone II) por tion of the flap. Preoperative obesity (>125% ideal body weight) correlated strongly with fat necrosis (p<0.009), whereas smoking and cup size did not . The authors' review has prompted the preferential use of free TRAM in obe se patients, and has caused them to consider zone II to be less reliable th an previously appreciated.