Modeling colony-site dynamics: A case study of gull-billed terns (Sterna nilotica) in coastal Virginia

Citation
Rm. Erwin et al., Modeling colony-site dynamics: A case study of gull-billed terns (Sterna nilotica) in coastal Virginia, AUK, 115(4), 1998, pp. 970-978
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
AUK
ISSN journal
00048038 → ACNP
Volume
115
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
970 - 978
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-8038(199810)115:4<970:MCDACS>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
We developed a Markov process model for colony-site dynamics of Gull-billed Terns (Sterna nilotica). From 1993 through 1996, we monitored breeding num bers of Gull-billed Terns and their frequent colony associates, Common Tern s (Sterna hirundo) and Black Skimmers (Rynchops niger), at colony sites alo ng 80 km of the barrier island region of coastal Virginia. We also monitore d flooding events and renesting. We developed the model for colony survival , extinction, and recolonization at potential colony sites over the four-ye ar period. We then used data on annual site occupation by Gull-billed Terns to estimate model parameters and tested for differences between nesting su bstrates (barrier island vs, shellpile). Results revealed a dynamic system but provided no evidence that the dynamics were Markovian, i.e. the probabi lity that a site was occupied in one year was not influenced by whether it had been occupied in the previous year. Nor did colony-level reproductive s uccess the previous season seem to affect the probability of site occupancy . Site survival and recolonization rates were similar, and the estimated ov erall annual probability of a site being occupied was 0.59. Of the 25 sites that were used during the four-year period, 16 were used in one or two yea rs only and only three were used in all four years. Flooding and renesting were frequent in both habitat types in all years. The frequent flooding of nests on shellpiles argues for more effective management; augmentation with shell and sand to increase elevations as little as 20 cm could have reduce d flooding at a number of sites. The low colony-site fidelity that we obser ved suggests that an effective management approach would be to provide a la rge number of sand and/or shellpile sites for use by nesting terns. Sites n ot used in one year may still be used in subsequent years.