This study examined male behavior in response to the risk of cannibalism in
the Mediterranean praying mantid, Iris oratoria (Mantodea: Mantidae). The
risk of cannibalism was manipulated by placing males in one of two position
s at the start of a mating trial: Frontal, where the males faced the female
s' fronts (high risk of cannibalism), or Rear, where the males were behind
the females, facing their posteriors (lower risk). Three male behaviors wer
e examined in terms of risk-reduction: whether the male attempted to mount
the female, the direction of his first mount attempt, and the time taken fo
r him to attempt to mount. Initial position did not have a significant effe
ct on whether males attempted to mount the females. Males showed a preferen
ce for non-frontal mount attempts, and males placed Frontally were less lik
ely to mount from their initial direction than were males placed in the Rea
r. Males placed in the Rear attempted to mount sooner than males placed Fro
ntally, especially if the males could approach and mount while remaining be
hind the females. While the males approached the females, movements by both
sexes resulted in changes in how the males faced the females, which might
explain why the males' initial positions did not strongly predict attacks b
y the females. Interestingly, attacks by the females did not result in cann
ibalism; these attacks might reflect the females' state of sexual receptivi
ty or they might indicate female choice. Female phenotype and the time of y
ear influenced male behavior. Males were more likely to attempt to mount fe
males of high feeding condition. In this study. this result is more compati
ble with male choice for fecund females than with male choice for non-canni
balistic females. Males became less likely to attempt mounts as the year pr
ogressed. possibly a result of the onset of cold weather.