J. Gardosi et A. Francis, Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts, BR J OBST G, 106(4), 1999, pp. 309-317
Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a policy
of standard antenatal care which included plotting fundal height measuremen
ts on customised antenatal charts in the community.
Design Prospective, non-randomised, controlled, population-based study.
Population Two defined and separate referral areas from community to teachi
ng hospital, with similar delivery rates and socioeconomic characteristics.
A total of 1272 consecutively booked women with singleton pregnancies and
dating ultrasound scans before 22 weeks of gestation.
Intervention In the study area customised fundal height charts were issued
to each mother at the routine hospital booking scan, on which regular funda
l height measurements were to be plotted by community midwives. The charts
adjusted limits according to maternal characteristics including height, wei
ght, parity and ethnic group. Usual management in the control area included
fundal height assessment by abdominal palpation and recording on a standar
d co-operation card.
Outcome measures Antenatal detection of small and large for gestational age
babies; number of antenatal investigations for fetal growth in each group.
Results The study group had a significantly higher antenatal detection rate
of small for gestational age babies (48% vs 29%, odds ratio 2.2, 95% confi
dence interval 1.1-4.5) and large for gestational age babies (46% vs 24%, O
R 2.6, CI 1.3-5.5). There was no increase in the study group in the overall
number of scans per pregnancy done in the ultrasound department (1.2 vs 1.
3, P = 0.14), but a slight decrease in repeat (two or more) third trimester
scans (OR 0.8, CI 0.6-1.0, P = 0.08). Women in the study group had signifi
cantly fewer referrals for investigation in a pregnancy assessment centre (
OR 0.7, CI 0.5-0.9; P = 0.01) and fewer admissions to the antenatal ward (O
R 0.6, CI 0.4-0.7, P < 0.001). There were no differences in perinatal outco
me.
Conclusions Serial measurement of fundal height plotted on customised chart
s leads to increased antenatal detection of small and large babies. This is
accompanied by fewer investigations, which is likely to represent increase
d confidence in the community to recognise normal fetal growth. With adjust
ments for physiological variables, fundal height measurements appear to be
a cost effective screening method which can result in substantial improveme
nts in the antenatal assessment of fetal growth.