The laboratory is frequently the primary source for making the diagnos
is of Lyme borreliosis when the symptoms are vague and the clinical ha
llmarks are missing. However, the temptation to interpret the laborato
ry results out of context from the clinical history and presentation s
hould be avoided since the laboratory tests for evidence of B. burgdor
feri infection can also be problematic. These problems have included s
ensitivity/specificity problems, lack of standardization of both metho
dology and interpretation, and lack of routine direct evidence (ie cul
ture) testing. These problems are discussed as well as possible soluti
ons, It should be noted that meaningful results can usually be obtaine
d from these tests if caution is used in their interpretation and the
clinical symptomatology, history, and examination are integrated with
the laboratory results.