Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) integrates over all potential
earthquake occurrences and ground motions to estimate the mean frequency of
exceedance of any given spectral acceleration at the site. For improved co
mmunication and insights, it is becoming common practice to display the rel
ative contributions to that hazard from the range of values of magnitude, M
, distance, R, and epsilon, epsilon, the number of standard deviations from
the median ground motion as predicted by an attenuation equation.
The proposed disaggregation procedures, while conceptually similar, differ
in several important points that are often not reported by the researchers
and not appreciated by the users. We discuss here such issues, for example,
definition of the probability distribution to be disaggregated, different
disaggregation techniques, disaggregation of R versus In R, and the effects
of different binning strategies on the results. Misconception of these det
ails may lead to unintended interpretations of the relative contributions t
o hazard.
Finally, we propose to improve the disaggregation process by displaying haz
ard contributions in terms of not R, but latitude, longitude, as well as M
and epsilon. This permits a display directly on a typical map of the faults
of the surrounding area and hence enables one to identify hazard-dominatin
g scenario events and to associate them with one or more specific faults, r
ather than a given distance. This information makes it possible to account
for other seismic source characteristics, such as rupture mechanism and nea
r-source effects, during selection of scenario-based ground-motion time his
tories for structural analysis.