C. Lerman et al., Racial differences in testing motivation and psychological distress following pretest education for BRCA1 gene testing, CANC EPID B, 8(4), 1999, pp. 361-367
Objectives. We conducted a randomized trial to investigate racial differenc
es in response to two alternate pretest education strategics for BRCA1 gene
tic testing: a standard education model and an education plus counseling (E
+C) model.
Materials and Methods. Two hundred twenty-eight Caucasian women and 70 Afri
can American women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer were c
ontacted for a baseline telephone interview to assess sociodemographic char
acteristics, number of relatives affected with cancer, and race before pret
est education. Outcome variables included changes from baseline to 1-month
follow-up in cancer-related distress and genetic testing intentions, as wel
l as provision of a blood sample after the education session.
Results. African American women were found to differ significantly from Cau
casian women in the effects of the interventions on testing intentions and
provision of a blood sample. Specifically, in African American women, E+C l
ed to greater increases than education only in intentions to be tested and
provision of a blood sample. These effects were independent of socioeconomi
c status and referral mechanisms. In Caucasian women, there were no differe
ntial effects of the interventions on these outcomes. Reductions in cancer-
specific distress a ere evidenced in all study groups. However, this decrea
se, although not significantly different, was smallest among African Americ
an women who received E+C,
Conclusions. In low- to moderate-risk African American women, pretest educa
tion and counseling may motivate BRCA1 testing. Further research is needed
to explore the mechanisms of impact of the alternate pretest education stra
tegies and to increase the cultural sensitivity of education and counseling
protocols.