Heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs), formed during the cooking of foods, ar
e known to induce tumours in rodent bioassays acid may thus contribute to h
uman cancer risk. We tested six HAAs in a morphological transformation assa
y and in three in vitro genotoxicity assays. The morphological transforming
abilities of HAAs were tested, in the presence of rat-liver S9, in the C3H
/M2 fibroblast cell line. Concentration levels of 50 mu M 2-amino-3,8-dimet
hylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (8-MeIQx), 100 mu M 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimi
dazo-[4,5-f]quinoxaline (4,8-DiMeIQx), 50 mu M 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-
f]quinoline (IQ), 100 mu M 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (A alpha
C), 100 mu M 2-amino-3methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeA alpha C) and 15 m
u M 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) induced maximum
transformation potencies of 5.5, 6.6, 6.3, 5.2, 7.3 and 9.2 transformed fo
ci per 10(4) surviving cells, respectively. Bacterial mutagenic activity wa
s determined in the presence of rat-liver S9 using the Salmonella typhimuri
um reverse-mutation assay employing strain YG1019. Mutagenic potencies of 3
800 revertants (revs)lng with 8-MeIQx, 2900 revs/ng with 4,8-DiMeIQx, 3480
revs/ng with IQ, 1.6 revs/ng with AaC, 2.9 revs/ng with MeAaC and 5 revs/ng
with PhIP were observed. Clastogenic activity in vitro was analysed by the
micronucleus assay in metabolically competent MCL-5 cells. Dose-dependent
induction of micronuclei was observed for all HAAs tested with 1-5.4 % of c
ells containing micronuclei at 10 ng/ml, Micronucleus induction was in the
order 4,8-DiMeIQx > 8-MeIQx > IQ > MeA alpha C > PhIP > AaC, DNA strand-bre
aking activity in MCL-5 cells was measured by the alkaline single cell-gel
(comet) assay. The lowest effect doses for significant increases (P less th
an or equal to 0.0007, Mann-Whitney test) in comet tail length (mu m) were
45.5 mu g/ml (200 mu M) for PhIP, 90.9 mu g/ml (410-510 mu M) for 4,8-DiMeI
Qx, IQ, MeA alpha C and A alpha C, and 454.5 mu g/ml (2130 mu M) for 8-MeIQ
x, It is not yet clear which of these assays most accurately reflects the g
enotoxic potential to humans of compounds of this class of environmental ca
rcinogens.