The relationship between abdominal aortic aneurysm wall compliance, maximum diameter and growth rate

Citation
K. Wilson et al., The relationship between abdominal aortic aneurysm wall compliance, maximum diameter and growth rate, CARDIOV SUR, 7(2), 1999, pp. 208-213
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
09672109 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
208 - 213
Database
ISI
SICI code
0967-2109(199903)7:2<208:TRBAAA>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Aim: Aortic compliance as measured by the pressure-strain elastic modulus ( Ep) and stiffness (beta) may allow a more precise estimate of rupture risk The aim of this study was to determine the relationships between compliance , maximal aneurysm diameter and growth rate. Methods: Sixty abdominal aorti c aneurysm patients of median age 73 years, were studied. Growth rate was d erived from repeat ultrasound scans obtained over a median period of 21 mon ths (range 6-48), At the end of follow-up, patients underwent measurement o f maximum aortic diameter, Ep and beta using the Diamove echo-tracking syst em. Results: Growth rate correlated positively (r = 0.6, P < 0.01) with max imum diameter on entry to the study There was a positive correlation betwee n mean arterial pressure and Ep (r = 0.3, P = 0.03), but not between mean a rterial pressure and beta (r = 0.8, P = 0.61). A positive correlation was f ound between final maximum diameter and Ep (r = 0.22, P = 0.04) but not bet a (r = 0.16, P = 0.11). There was no significant relationship between growt h rate and Ep or beta. Conclusion: Large aneurysms tended to be less compli ant. Within a population of abdominal aortic aneurysm of similar maximum di ameter there was a 10-fold variation in Ep and beta. Compliance and growth rate were not related. If aortic compliance is related to risk of rupture t hen this predictive information is likely to be largely independent of that currently obtained from size and growth rate. (C) 1999 The International S ociety for Cardiovascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All r ights reserved.