Twenty-four-hour serum amylase predicting pancreatic reaction after endoscopic sphincterotomy

Citation
Pa. Testoni et al., Twenty-four-hour serum amylase predicting pancreatic reaction after endoscopic sphincterotomy, ENDOSCOPY, 31(2), 1999, pp. 131-136
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ENDOSCOPY
ISSN journal
0013726X → ACNP
Volume
31
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
131 - 136
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-726X(199902)31:2<131:TSAPPR>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Background and Study Aims: Acute pancreatitis is still the most common comp lication after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), The aim of this study was to detect the time when the peak of serum amylase was predictive for postprocedure pancreatitis or long-lasting seve re hyperamylasemia, in order to plan the follow-up of patients. Methods: Serum amylase activity was measured in a prospective series of 409 consecutive patients after ES, immediately before ES and two, four, eight and 24 hours thereafter; the two, four and eight-hour data were compared wi th those at 24 hours and with the outcome. Evaluation was done separately f or the 198 cases with pancreatic duct opacification and for the 202 cases a t high risk for postprocedure pancreatitis. Results: Twenty-four hours after ES, amylase was still more than five times the upper normal limit in 26 patients, associated with pancreatic-like pai n in 19 of them (mild/moderate pancreatitis) and asymptomatic in the remain ing seven (long-lasting severe hyperamylasemia), There was a significant di fference at all sampling times between the 26 patients with 24-hour severe hyperamylasemia and those with the lower level, Although the sensitivity of amylase measurement in detecting pancreatitis was highest at eight hours, in practice the four-hour assessment appears a reliable predictor, Almost a ll patients with serum amylase levels more than five times the upper normal limit at four, eight and 24 hours had had pancreatic duct opacification, I n contrast, patient-related risk factors for postprocedure pancreatitis did not play a significant role in the present series. Conclusions: Serum amylase assessment four hours after ES is a reliable, co st-effective follow-up and minimizes the likelihood of underestimating the risk of postprocedure pancreatic reaction. It should be recommended particu larly in out-patients and when pancreatic duct opacification has occurred.