Changes in the quality of coal combustion by-products produced by Kentuckypower plants, 1978 to 1997: consequences of Clean Air Act directives

Citation
Jc. Hower et al., Changes in the quality of coal combustion by-products produced by Kentuckypower plants, 1978 to 1997: consequences of Clean Air Act directives, FUEL, 78(6), 1999, pp. 701-712
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry,"Chemical Engineering
Journal title
FUEL
ISSN journal
00162361 → ACNP
Volume
78
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
701 - 712
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-2361(199905)78:6<701:CITQOC>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The original US Clean Air Act (CAA), implemented by the Environmental Prote ction Agency in 1971, and the amendments to the act in 1977 and 1990 have r equired a considerable evolution of the quality of coal burned by utilities and in the type pollution control equipment needed to reduce SO2 and NOx e missions. Any change in coal quality or emission's control implies a change in the amount, type, and quality of coal combustion by-products (CCB). CCB is a collective term for fly ash, bottom ash and boiler slag, and flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) or fluidized-bed combustion produced in coal burning . Studies by the University of Kentucky in 1978, 1992, and 1997, the latter t wo conducted by the Center for Applied Energy Research, have focussed on th e amount, quality, and end use of CCBs from Kentucky power plants, with par ticular emphasis on fly ash. The evolution of clean air standards has impacted the quality and volume of CCBs in a variety of ways: (1) switching from high sulfur to lower sulfur coal generates lower quantities of spinel phases and greater amounts of alu mine-silicate glasses; (2) switching to Powder River Basin subbituminous co als produces Class C fly ash, compared to Class F fly ash from the combusti on of the typical eastern bituminous coals; (3) the wider use of beneficiat ed coals reduces the amount of Ay ash and bottom ash produced; (4) use of a wider rank range into the coal blend increases the potential of unburned c arbon caused by inefficient combustion of non-design coals; (5) the inclusi on of non-coal fuels, such as petroleum coke and with tire-derived fuel, in the coal blend; (6) reduction of NOx emissions has generally meant an init ial increase in the amount of carbon in the fly ash; (7) addition of FGD me ans an added CCB stream, either a calcium sulfite which in generally mixed with fly ash and landfilled, or a calcium sulfate, which is sold for wallbo ard manufacture. The modification of the petrology and chemistry of the fly ash impacts the potential for utilization. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserv ed.