Without definitional clarity the "quango debate" is inherently flawed and m
eaningful progress undermined. A possible solution to this problem is propo
sed in this article by way of a subsectional map which aims to clarify the
quango topography. This accepts the diversity inherent in the quango debate
while allowing for increased clarity and focused research. This, the autho
rs believe, is the only way forward for practitioners, academics and policy
makers working within the sphere of quasi-government. There is a need to ad
dress precise forms or subsections of the quango continuum as studies or re
forms which focus on one type of quango would not necessarily work if appli
ed to all quangos, or quangos in other countries.