A. Rieutord et al., LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION USING LANTHANIDES AS TIME-RESOLVED LUMINESCENCE PROBES FOR DRUGS AND XENOBIOTICS - ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS, Analyst, 122(5), 1997, pp. 59-66
Lanthanide sensitized luminescence is a very attractive alternative to
UV detection and other luminescence techniques, i.e., fluorescence an
d phosphorescence, in separation science for the detection of drugs an
d xenobiotics because of the large Stokes shift, narrow emission bands
and long lifetime, Some published applications of HPLC determination
with lanthanide (Ln(3+)) sensitized luminescence detection are reviewe
d, Advantages and limitations of this technique are discussed, Normal-
phase (NP) HPLC is not influenced by the quenching effect of water whe
reas reversed-phase (RP) HPLC is applicable to more compounds than NP-
HPLC, However, pH adjustment and the quenching effect of water on Ln(3
+) luminescence are the main drawbacks of RP-HPLC, Elution properties
and the need for pH adjustment are two arguments for selecting the mod
e of addition of Ln(3+), i.e., pre- or post-column in the HPLC system,
Sensitized Ln(3+) luminescence detection is a much more specific meth
od of detection than UV or fluorescence detection after HPLC separatio
n but nevertheless, in some cases, does not always exhibit a significa
nt increase in analytical performance when the donor itself is a stron
g fluorophore. The development of more powerful excitation sources cou
ld improve the limit of detection of the Ln(3+) sensitized detection t
echnique, This review suggests that it would be useful to obtain predi
cting factors about the drug to establish whether the latter is suitab
le to be measured using an HPLC-Ln(3+) approach.