P. Dourish et G. Button, On "technomethodology": Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design, HUM-COMP IN, 13(4), 1998, pp. 395-432
Over the past 10 years, the use of sociological methods and sociological re
asoning have become more prominent in the analysis and design of interactiv
e systems. For a variety of reasons, one form of sociological inquiry-ethno
methodology-has become something of a favored approach. Our goal in this ar
ticle is to investigate the consequences of approaching system design from
the ethnomethodological perspective. In particular, we are concerned with h
ow ethnomethodology can take a foundational place in the very notion of sys
tem design, rather than simply being employed as a resource in aspects of t
he process, such as requirements elicitation and specification.
We begin by outlining the basic elements of ethnomethodology and discussing
the place that it has come to occupy in computer-supported cooperative wor
k and, increasingly, in human-computer interaction, We discuss current appr
oaches to the use of ethnomethodology in systems design, and we point to th
e contrast between the use of ethnomethodology for critique and for design.
Currently, understandings of how to use ethnomethodology as a primary aspe
ct of system design are lacking. We outline a new approach and present an e
xtended example of its use. This approach takes as its starting point a rel
ationship between ethnomethodology and system design that is a foundational
, theoretical matter rather than simply one of design practice and process.
From this foundation, we believe, emerges a new model of interaction with
computer systems, which is based on ethnomethodological perspectives on eve
ryday human social action.