A 1996 survey of Hong Kong establishments designed to identify hiring and e
mployment patterns by workers' age shows that, as in the United States, man
y firms employed older workers but did not hire older workers. This pattern
appears to reflect mainly economic forces, rather than public policy, give
n that no laws prohibited age discrimination or required uniform fringe ben
efit provision in Hong Kong. The empirical evidence from the survey is cons
istent with two broad hypotheses. First, workers and firms are more willing
to invest in training when workers are young. Second, delayed compensation
more effectively deters shirking among young workers than among older work
ers and is more readily accepted by young workers.